Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Quick Critiques – May 15, 2011

  • Reviews - Quick Critiques

Action Comics #900 (DC Comics)
by Paul Cornell, Pete Woods, Jesus Merino & many other creators

I heard some good things about this comic book (not from Fox News, obviously), so I decided to check it out. First of all, while this is issue #900, it isn’t the 900th issue — it’s the 902nd (remember issues #0 and #1,000,000). The strong storytelling that a friend told me about wasn’t to be found in the main story, which wraps up writer Paul Cornell and artist Pete Woods’ lengthy Lex Luthor arc, and it falls completely flat. While the inner conflict that ultimately proves to be an omnipotent villain’s undoing is a nice bit of super-hero genre writing, the path that gets the audience there is dizzying. I’ve read a lot of “The Black Ring,” and I honestly don’t know what’s going on here, even with all of the exposition. Furthermore, the inclusion of “Reign of the Doomsdays” plot elements interrupts the main story; it’s like a square peg being jammed into a round hole. The shifts back and forth between the two disparate plotlines is jarring, and Jesus Merino’s rough linework pales in comparison with the more polished, interesting work Woods offers up. Of course, I’m not always clear on what’s happening in those Superman/Luthor sequences either; they’re pretty, but often vague.

David Goyer’s story in which Superman renounces his U.S. citizenship is much ado about nothing; the character isn’t turning his back on the States but instead dedicates himself to the entire planet. The story itself is oversimplified and overwrought; it’s a good think it was a short story and not a full issue of the series. The storyboarded Richard Donner screenplay was quite disappointing. Not only is the plot uninspired, the decision to use rough storyboards instead of reinterpreting the script as a comic-book story was a misstep. The Geoff Johns/Gary Frank Legion story is a fun concept, but unfortunately, they don’t really see it all of the way through. The strength my friend told me about is Damon Lindelof’s small contribution to the Superman mythos. It’s incredibly effective and engrossing, and it’s thanks to the misdirection in the piece. Ryan Sook’s rich, textured artwork is absolutely lovely as well. 4/10

Fear Itself #2 (Marvel Comics)
by Matt Fraction, Stuart Immonen & Wade von Grawbadger

I love the way this book looks. The designs for the new hammer-wielding pawns of the Serpent are striking, achieving a nice balance between sci-fi elements and imagery that puts one in mind of Norse runes. Immonen also conveys a lot of drama through the characters’ expressions, and inker Wade von Grawbadger brings a nice, crisp polish to the pencils. Furthermore, Laura Martin’s brilliant colors reinforce the magical and cosmic nature of the conflict without making things seem too bright. I also thoroughly enjoyed the wide array of characters that are included in the story. One really gets the impression that the story is spanning and involving the entire Marvel Universe (even though we’ve really only seen characters that are already spotlighted in other titles).

Odin’s role in the story is an ongoing point of contention. I just don’t buy into his short-sightedness and willingness to sacrifice an entire planet full o people, especially since we haven’t seen what sort of threat the Serpent and its forces represent. But most frustrating is the fact that nothing really happens in this issue. The same scene keeps repeating, as we see heroes and villains alike transformed after touching enchanted hammers that have crashed to Earth from space. After the second instance, it stops being interesting, especially when one finds out later in the issue that some of the scenes that begin in this comic book will run their course in other titles I don’t planning on purchasing. Since the story doesn’t advance here, this comes off more as an exercise in marketing than storytelling. I don’t mind big crossover event books as long as the story is good, and I’m still waiting for a story after two issues and eight bucks. 5/10

Gladstone’s School for World Conquerors #1 (Image Comics)
by Mark Andrew Smith & Armand Villavert

The manager at my local comic shop recommended this comic highly, and I was already curious about it, as the colorful cover caught my eye when it hit the stands a couple of weeks ago. Furthermore, given Image’s track record as of late in publishing strong, original new titles, that was enough to get me to check this comic book out. Unfortunately for me, I found that Gladstone’s didn’t continue the trend of strong storytelling that we’ve found in such titles as Nonplayer, Undying Love and other recent Image releases. This comic, about a school for super-villains, is hardly reinventing the wheel. Gladstone’s is basically a spin on the Hogwart’s concept. The character concepts are fairly generic — cute, but rather familiar, truth be told. Still, there’s a lot of energy in the book once the focus turns to the students. Unfortunately, the first third of the book focuses on the history of the school, and it’s really not information the reader needed in order to appreciate the story and characters. The title itself tells the audience almost everything it needs to know.

Armand Villavert’s artwork is highly reminiscent of the style of Michael Avon (Powers, Takio) Oeming. Like the character concepts, the character designs are cute but somewhat derivative. Of course, the creators often explore archetypes here rather than actual characters, so I suppose that’s to be expected. I was disappointed to find that the backgrounds throughout this comic were lacking. Given the setting, there’s a lot of opportunity for imagination and invention, but there’s never a strong sense of place, of what this unusual school actually looks like inside. The most striking thing about the artwork on this book is colors. Colorist Carlos Carrasco employs an exceedingly bright palette. The colors — almost Day-Glo in their brightness — really dominate almost every page, every panel. I get what he’s trying to do. It looks as though he’s trying to strike a balance between a lighter, more playful look and an eerie, even surreal mood. But the colors end up overwhelming the line art as a result. 5/10

Herc #2 (Marvel Comics)
by Greg Pak, Fred van Lente, Neil Edwards & Scott Hanna

While I didn’t read Chaos War, the event that resurrected the “deceased” Hercules and led to this title, I was looking forward to it, as writers Pak and van Lente did an excellent job with the title character in his previous series, The Incredible Hercules (which had taken over the run of Incredible Hulk for a while). Pak and van Lente have continued their incorporation of Greek myth in greater detail, but some of what I enjoyed about Incredible Herc is missing from plain ol’ Herc. Absent is the joy. The humor and irreverence that one often found in that previous series are lacking here. Also missing is Amadeus Cho. Incredible Herc really had two main protagonists, and removing Cho from the equation here definitely weakens the Marvel’s modern Hercules brand. The interplay between the brawn and the brains really made those prior comics a lot of fun to read. When I read this issue and last month’s debut, I didn’t have fun. Arming the character with an arsenal of mythic weapons is a good idea, but the darker, urban tone of the plotting and premise overwhelms that more colorful concept.

The art is capable and clear for the most part, but again, there’s no fun here. Penciller Neil Edwards tries to render the Hobgoblin in a realistic fashion, and the approach just doesn’t suit the character. Hobgoblin looks odd rather than monstrous. I also find it odd that while Hercules’ new costume is depicted on both the cover and the teaser for the next issue on the last page, it makes no appearance at all in this issue. He’s still in his old, look-at-my-chest-hair togs, and the new outfit should really be here to serve as a visual cue that this is a new direction for the character. 4/10

Richie Rich: Rich Rescue #1 (Ape Entertainment)
by various

Those looking for an all-ages read here need not bother, but that doesn’t mean this isn’t a good comic book. It’s a good comic for kids, not all ages. The creators here have reinvented Richie Rich, more from a visual perspective than a conceptual one, though. Gone is the Harvey Comics house style that we normally associated with the character. In its place is a more contemporary but cartoony approach; in fact, this looks like a platform for a 21st-century take on the title character as a globetrotting adventurer/philanthropist for animation. The balloon-headed character designs are replaced with more… well, realistic isn’t the right word, but slightly more appropriately proportioned looks for the characters. I was a little disappointed with a couple of the newer elements; Cadbury is reimagined as a lantern-jawed, barrel-chested muscle man rather than the lean, bald, stoic butler we got to know in Richie Rich comics of the past. The plotting is simple but serviceable for a younger audience. The colors on the stories featuring these retooled characters are a little too gaudy for my taste; there are lost opportunities to set a slightly darker (though fun) mood when called for.

I was pleased to find that the producers of this comic book take care to acknowledge where the property came from. There’s an essay by Richie Rich co-creator Sid Jacobsen that outlines the character’s history (with hyperbole that would do Stan Lee proud), but more importantly, there’s a “classic” style Richie Rich story included in this comic as well. At first, I thought we were looking at a reprint, but artist Ernie Colon’s apparent use of computer art for some elements made me think differently. It’s a cute story, but incredibly simple and not entirely logical at times. It’ll entertain the tykes, but there’s not much here for the older set. 6/10

Follow Eye on Comics on Twitter.

May 15, 2011 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

Eye on the Eisners: Dong Xoai, Vietnam 1965 → ← Speed Reading

5 thoughts on “Quick Critiques – May 15, 2011”

  1. Sean Limbaugh says:
    May 16, 2011 at 5:40 am

    Who said good things about Action Comics #900? Liberals and your fellow Canadians? I’m not surprise that someone who isn’t born and bred in the United States considers Superman renouncing his U.S. citizenship as “much ado about nothing”. If you had a Canadian superhero who is as noble as Superman, well used to be, renounced Canada, you’ll blow your comic-reading mind off. Anyway, what’s with the Fox News bashing? I thought that’s more of a Randy Lander thing. I’m sure the likes of Alan Colmes sleep next to the issue of Action Comics #900.

  2. Don MacPherson says:
    May 16, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    Sean wrote:
    If you had a Canadian superhero who is as noble as Superman, well used to be, renounced Canada, you’ll blow your comic-reading mind off.

    Not true. I honestly couldn’t care less; doesn’t affect me as a Canadian one way or the other. Oh, also, it’s a work of fiction. And as for a Canadian super-hero renouncing citizenship, Wolverine’s been out of the country for a LONNNNNNNGGGGGG time. I’m fine.

    One of the problems with the argument that Superman shouldn’t renounce his U.S. citizenship is that those against it have the attitude that there’s U.S. citizenship is superior to any other citizenship on the planet. The “U.S.A. is #1” attitude really isn’t borne out by facts. I’m not saying Canada is superior, but I’m not saying my country or others are inferior either.

    Anyway, what’s with the Fox News bashing? I thought that’s more of a Randy Lander thing.

    Where exactly did I bash Fox News? I mentioned that Fox commentators weren’t among those who recommended this comic. And that’s true. They criticized the Goyer story and DC Comics for publishing it. So how did I “bash” Fox?

    And as for Randy Lander’s views, I don’t understand why you bring him up. My former reviewing partner (on The Fourth Rail and other prior sites) hasn’t reviewed comics in years.

  3. Sean Limbaugh says:
    May 17, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    I seem to remember replying to your reply? Now it’s gone. Don, did you deleted it cause you like to have the last words so people will think that poor Sean is so shook up by your reply that he’s too scared to challenge Don. Or it is just a technical glitch that deleted my post? Somehow, I don’t think it’s the latter.

  4. Don MacPherson says:
    May 17, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    No, I deleted your post because you were ignoring logic, making sweeping generalizations and unjustified accusations. I’ve let you sound off before. There’s nothing wrong with conservative viewpoints, but I felt you crossed the line with your previous comment. I deleted. My site, my perogative.

    If you want to make a more reasoned reply, feel free. But don’t put words in my mouth or paint entire groups of people (ie. Canadians) with the same brush.

  5. CapCanuck says:
    May 20, 2011 at 11:12 am

    @ Sean – I have no idea why you are so angry…You inferred A LOT from Don’s review. Are you related to “Rush”? That would make sense, given the wacky nature of your post(s). You need to chill out dude.

    On another point, about “blowing our comic reading mind off”, we as Canadian comic book readers had to suffer through much worse than a super hero renouncing his citizenship (no matter how contrived) to become a super hero TO THE WORLD (which is far more in line with Superman’s TRUE morals and values anyway). Bendis killed off Canada’s greatest super hero team, Alpha Flight “off panel” and later replaced then with frickin American super heroes. And you know what? We voted with our dollars and now (hopefully) we will get the real Alpha Flight back.

    Oh yeah, Superman? Co-created by a Canadian. So maybe it should be “Truth, Justice and the North American Way” anyway?

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • The End of the World As He Knows It
  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters
  • Genre Splicing
  • A Mouthful of Dollars
  • Striking the Wrong Chord

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • The End of the World As He Knows It
  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Coming Clean
  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
April 2021
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456