Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

A New 52 Review: Legion of Super-Heroes #1

  • Reviews - DC
  • The New 52 Review Project

Legion of Super-Heroes #1
“Renegade World”
Writer: Paul Levitz
Artist: Francis Portela
Colors: Javier Mena
Letters: Patrick Brosseau
Cover artist: Karl Kerschl
Editor: Chris Conroy
Publisher: DC Comics
Price: $2.99 US

As I noted in my review of Legion Lost #1, I’m a longtime Legion fan, so in theory, I should’ve been an easy sell on this book, but nothing’s ever easy, is it? The Legion has probably undergone more reboots than any other DC property, but I have good news for those lamenting having to start over with these characters yet again. This series isn’t a reboot of the Legion. Instead, it’s a continuation of the previous series, as well as the “Legion Academy” feature from the most recent incarnation of Adventure Comics. Writer Paul Levitz seems to pick up pretty much from where he left off. Of course, for those of us who weren’t reading his Legion stories before the New 52 line-wide relaunch at DC Comics, his script is impenetrable. Not only does the script heavily reference previous stories, it even references a story we haven’t seen: the apparent “loss” of the Legionnaires trapped in the past (as per Legion Lost). To make matters worse, the art is incredibly busy and cluttered. I can’t imagine this series will appeal to anyone except the most die-hard Legion completists.

Chameleon Boy leads a recon team to a “watchworld,” a United Planets outpost dedicated to surveil the Dominion, because the government has lost contact with the facility’s staff. It’s not long before the heroes discover the monitoring station is being adapted to other ends, making for a potential breach of the five-year peace that’s existed between the UP and the malevolent Dominion. Meanwhile, back on Earth at Legion headquarters, Legionnaires lament the loss of comrades (trapped in the past, unbeknownst to them), the loss of a planet, and the loss of stability in the team.

Artist Francis Portela boasts a fairly standard super-hero style, and some of the figures remind me of the kind of anatomy, detail and presence Chris (Booster Gold) Batista brings to comic art. Portela’s biggest problem in this issue is his penchant for overdoing the detail, but in the background and foreground. The art is terribly busy, and my eye never seems to want to focus on the proper point in any given panel. The same holds true for some of the character designs, specifically the newer Legionnaires. Not only is Dragonwing’s look kind of ugly, but it’s overdone. There’s no iconic look that says “super-hero” about her. The same holds true for the new Chemical King. Conversely, Comet Queen boasts a sleek, simple look, but her design is almost three decades old. The design work for the new characters leaves a lot to be desired. Portela also missteps with an aspect of the plot. Dragonwing and Chem King are said to be “undercover” on the watchworld as young lovers because they’re so new, they’re not recognizable as Legionnaires. Is that’s the case, why do both of them sport big Legion symbols, identifying them as members of the team?

Even if the art weren’t overwhelming and needlessly detailed, it would be hard to enjoy it when one compared it to the lovely cover art by Karl Kerschl. There’s a lovely, airy look to the figures on Kerschl’s cover, and the style reinforces the sci-fi/alien elements not to mention the youthful energy of the characters. I would’ve loved to see a Legion book illustrated by Kerschl — or any book in the New 52 lineup, for that matter. The logo on the cover is a bit off, unfortunately. While the letter designs and the metallic, gold color captures a sense of the future (in which this story is set), some of the letters are distorted or misshapen. The “N” at the end of “Legion” is particularly odd, looking a bit like “iv and the “Es” and “Rs” don’t quite look right either.

Something called “Oaa,” a planet I believe, is no more. Mon-El no longer has a Green Lantern ring. Apparently, a recent member who wasn’t liked by most of the team (Earth-Man, I assume) is dead. These elements and more turn up in the script, and I honestly don’t know what Levitz and his characters are talking about. This is by far the least accessible of the New 52 titles thus far. Not only does this not read like a first issue, but it doesn’t even read like a second issue. This reads like a 17th issue. Levitz immerses the readership completely in the vision of the 31st century he’s been working on for past year or two, and he’s apparently given no thought to how a new reader could navigate this world.

Like past Legion stories I’ve loved, this comic book boasts a lot of familiar elements. It’s got a huge cast of colorful characters with a diverse array of powers. I love Legion stories in which plans are hatched to make the most of the different abilities in the team’s arsenal. I also love the notion the Legion’s always training new members, and that element turns up here in the form of recent Legion Academy graduates serving on the team. But this comic book ultimately isn’t like the Legion stories I’ve loved in the past, and not just because it’s inaccessible. It’s also missing a vital component. Levitz’s story is guilty of the biggest sin as far as a Legion story goes: it’s just not fun. 4/10

“New 52 Reviews” on Eye on Comics are sponsored by All New Comics, Happy Harbor Comics and Strange Adventures. Show your support for Eye on Comics by supporting these retailers.

Follow Eye on Comics on Twitter.

September 26, 2011 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

A Frank Discussion → ← A New 52 Review: Nightwing #1

3 thoughts on “A New 52 Review: Legion of Super-Heroes #1”

  1. Tom Galloway says:
    September 26, 2011 at 4:07 pm

    For what it’s worth, Oaa wasn’t a planet (probably the similarity to the Guardians’ Oa gave this impression), but the name of an Academy classmate killed in the final Adventure issue. And yep, the recent disliked member was Earth-Man; they use his last name, Niedrigh (sp?) rather than the codename.

  2. Don MacPherson says:
    September 27, 2011 at 11:10 pm

    Tom wrote:
    For what it’s worth, Oaa wasn’t a planet (probably the similarity to the Guardians’ Oa gave this impression), but the name of an Academy classmate killed in the final Adventure issue.

    What possessed Levitz to name a character so similarly to the Green Lantern Corps’ home base?

  3. Steve Lewis says:
    October 8, 2011 at 1:44 am

    Don wrote:
    Not only does the script heavily reference previous stories, it even references a story we haven’t seen: the apparent “loss” of the Legionnaires trapped in the past (as per Legion Lost). To make matters worse, the art is incredibly busy and cluttered. I can’t imagine this series will appeal to anyone except the most die-hard Legion completists.

    Absolutely true. I’ve not been reading comics for several years, but when I read about the New 52 relaunch, I thought it would be a good time to jump back in.

    Faugh. I had no idea what was going on. Some characters were identified, some not, and reading this review was the only thing that gave me any idea what the story was about. And while the coloring was nice, the art was geared only to overload, and it did.

    I think comic-book stories can be written so anyone jumping in can make sense of them if they try. They used to, back in the ’60s, but this comic book was an utter waste of time in even trying, as far as I’m concerned.

    The only point which I disagree with was the rating. 1 out of 10 would be generous!

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • The End of the World As He Knows It
  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters
  • Genre Splicing
  • A Mouthful of Dollars
  • Striking the Wrong Chord

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • The End of the World As He Knows It
  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Coming Clean
  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
April 2021
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456