Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Under Attack

  • Announcements

As a courts/crime reporter for a daily newspaper, I’m well aware many of the people I write about don’t want me to write about them. Defendants have begged me and attempted to bribe me not to run their names in the paper. I’m been cursed out and lied about. It comes with the territory, and I take appropriate (though fortunately minor) precautions to protect myself and my family.

And now I face retaliation from someone I wrote about on Eye on Comics.

In the fall of 2009, I wrote about a federal court decision out of Ontario ruling in favour of American cartoonist Rich Koslowski, who won a legal action against Hogan Scott Courrier, the owner of Geeks Galore Computer Center in Marmora, Ont., for copyright infringement. Courrier used an image from Koslowski’s 3 Geeks comics in signage and other material for his business. A year later, I wrote a followup piece, in which Koslowski confirmed he hadn’t received the court-ordered monetary award and that Courrier hadn’t removed the image from his business material. In that followup, I also quoted Courrier after having reached him via email to allow him to tell his side of the story.

That was the last I heard of the story — until last week.

More than two years after I published the original article and more than a year after the followup, my hosting service contacted me mid-week to notify me a complaint had been filed alleging a violation of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The complainant: Courrier. While both I and Courrier live and work in Canada, my hosting service is an American company, and it felt compelled to react to the complaint. A representative emailed me, notifying me the service had received a notification of an alleged violation under the act and informing me unless I responded with a “counter notification,” my account would be suspended. The following is an excerpt from the email sent to me by my hosting service:

It has been reported that your Web site, eyeoncomics.com, allegedly contains material in violation of copyright infringement laws contained in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). You can find this Act at the U.S. Copyright Office Web site (http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf).

I was notified by a representative of Geeks Galore Computer Center. They are claiming that your site contains material that infringes on their intellectual property rights. The following images/links were reported to having infringing material: http://www.eyeoncomics.com/?p=522

Unfortunately, I hadn’t checked my webmail for about a day, so by the time I saw it, my account was suspended and Eye on Comics was down for a short time. As soon as the service received my informal reply, though, the account was reinstated and Eye on Comics was live again — complete with the original content with which Courrier took issue.

Further communication with my hosting service revealed Courrier sent the following message to the service:

My name is Hogan Courrier, owner of Geeks Galore Computer Center. It seems Don MacPherson from Eye on Comics, hosted at your hosting facility is using my name and business name on his website without my permission. He is also acting in a slanderous and libel way with regards to my personal information. I would ask if you can have him remove my information and business information from his website.

And then there’s the following passage from Courrier’s formal letter of notification (which I received as a PDF document from my hosting service):

I have a good faith belief that the items or materials listed below are not authorized by law for use by the above named domain name owner or their agents and therefore infringes the copyright owner’s rights. I hereby demand that you act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material or items claimed to be infringing.

Allegedly infringing items or materials: Using my personal name and business information in a negative way without consent.

The hosting service also notified me Courrier was claiming the content constituted a breach of the Canadian Privacy Act. It’s a ludicrous claim. Simply referring to an individual and a business name in a legitimate piece of journalism doesn’t constitute a violation of copyright or privacy. Furthermore, reporting on a publicly and readily available court judgment doesn’t constitute libel. That I’ve had to respond to such outlandish and unrealistic allegations is frustrating, to say the least.

I was initially quite irked with the hosting service for failing to determine if there was an air of reality to Courrier’s claims and for seemingly siding with a complainant rather than a customer. However, further communication revealed staff were simply following procedure and once my counter notification was filed, the service won’t touch my account again unless directed to do so by a legal authority. A representative with the hosting service informed me thusly in a couple of emails:

I apologize to bother you again but it appears that the said representative from the previous emails we have discussed is not letting this issue go and has filed an official DMCA notice. I will attach it in this email so you can read over it. Because of this we are suppose to take steps to suspending your services with us unless you can provide us with a counter notification. Please let us know what you would like your next step of action to be. Thank you.

I believe there is some confusion about what exactly our role as the hosting company is in this situation. We in no way are accusing you of anything illegal and are not partial to either group in the situation. Because of U.S. law when we receive a DMCA complaint we are required to take steps to remove the content unless a counter notification is filed with us. So I didn’t examine your content or believe that you were in the wrong. We were simply following procedure. Since I have now gone ahead and forwarded your response to the original complainer that will work as a counter notification. Once a counter notification has been filed we as a hosting company is no longer involved unless we receive a court order requiring the removal of the data in question. I hope that makes sense. So essentially we just act as a middle man in the situation between you and the one who filed the DMCA complaint.

Like I mentioned at this point it is now up to the courts and we won’t take any action against your account unless we receive a court notification requiring such.

That came as a relief. I also learned the hosting service forwarded my explanations and defence of my content to Courrier, who’s apparently not satisfied, according to the hosting service:

I have now gone ahead and forwarded part of your email from yesterday to the person in question. I will wait to hear what they respond back, but it appears from my conversation from yesterday that they are willing to take legal action.

3 Geeks, copyright Rich KoslowskiNo such legal action has been launched, as far as I know. I’ve been served with no documents, and I’ve not heard from Courrier directly or from his legal counsel, if he’s retained any. Furthermore, I have no idea where such an action — the jurisdiction in which the hosting service is located; Marmora, Ont.; or Fredericton, New Brunswick — would be filed.

The irony of the situation is this false accusation of copyright infringement on my part comes from an individual who’s been found in breach of someone else’s copyright and has yet to make good on it. After I became aware of Courrier’s complaint, I contacted Koslowski to get an update on his dealings with the man.

“No, I haven’t ever seen a dime and yes he’s still using my copyrighted images. I tried pursuing this more but without being willing to pay even more money out-of-pocket to lawyers and/or collection agencies, etc. I had no recourse. I did call one collection agency up in Canada but they never even got back to me,” Koslowski told me last week. “I’m out over $8,000 as it is in legal fees and about a hundred hours of my time as it is.”

I will keep readers apprised of any significant developments in the situation. In the unlikely event it results in another disruption of Eye on Comics, I’ll inform colleagues at several other comics sites.

Follow Eye on Comics on Twitter.

April 2, 2012 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

Quoth the Raven → ← Future Imperfect

13 thoughts on “Under Attack”

  1. Dwight Williams says:
    April 2, 2012 at 7:20 am

    Copyright law as a journalism-suppression mechanism. We’ve all been warned about this being increasingly probable over the last few years.

  2. Bryan Lo says:
    April 2, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    This sort of guy slots in nicely under the definition of scum.

  3. justsaying says:
    April 2, 2012 at 2:39 pm

    Hogan Scott Courrier is a caught and punished copyright violator who is now trying to claim a copyright violation and does not understand public use or the journalism exception. What a tool.

  4. CapCanuck says:
    April 2, 2012 at 2:47 pm

    It is funny and pathetic – This guy has a blog on his website. One entry is “How Not to Get Scammed by Modeling Agencies”.

    http://www.geeksgalore.ca:8080/geeks/blog/archives/1037

    Too bad he does not apply his supposed sense of fair play and integrity to his OWN business dealings.

  5. akachris says:
    April 3, 2012 at 9:04 am

    Can’t Koslowski file the same DCMA complaint against Courrier and shut down Geeks Galore’s website if it’s still using his copyrighted imagery? Hopefully there is an inexpensive way to get an official legal judgement and directive [using the previous lawsuit and non-payment] to do this.

    Any lawyers out there willing to do some pro bono work?

  6. Don MacPherson says:
    April 3, 2012 at 10:51 am

    Akachris wrote:
    Can’t Koslowski file the same DCMA complaint against Courrier and shut down Geeks Galore’s website if it’s still using his copyrighted imagery?

    As noted in the articles, Geeks Galore is a Canadian business, so I’m doubtful the U.S. DMCA would have much effect north of the border. And Koslowski has pursued legal channels in Canada successfully, but to enforce his judgment, as Rich noted, it costs cash. I suspect it would be a pyhrric victory.

  7. Pingback: Comics A.M. | DMCA used to retaliate against comics blogger | Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources – Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment
  8. Atomic Kommie Comics says:
    April 3, 2012 at 11:58 am

    There’s no equivalent to the DMCA in Canadian copyright law?
    Wow!

  9. Don MacPherson says:
    April 3, 2012 at 2:07 pm

    I didn’t say there’s no equivalent. I’m sure there’s one or something in develeopment. And don’t forget, Koslowski got a copyright infringement judgment from a Canadian court.

  10. Patrick Roanhouse says:
    April 3, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    So this Scott Courrier art thief who is trying to silence the artist just said he banned me from emailing canada. after i sent him an email with this message

    “What kind of asshole has a really shitty website like yours and then steal someone else’s art and after they get caught File a DMCA when people write about how shitty and unethical they are?

    Oh that would be you”

    screenshots

    http://imgur.com/a/4BBS8

  11. Dwight Williams says:
    April 9, 2012 at 11:25 am

    Don’s referring to what the government’s currently listing as Bill C-32. There’s some argument over exactly how useful that bill will be and for whom.

  12. Ares says:
    April 12, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    If you look at his website the art is no longer there. And on his Facebook Page From April 2011:

    Just so everyone knows, we took down our old signs and are getting them replaced with new ones as the old ones were over 7 years old and getting worn. Xposure Graphics is making us NEW and Improved signs that will again be back up next week.

  13. Don MacPherson says:
    April 12, 2012 at 8:04 pm

    I hope that’s the case, Ares, but there’s no evidence of it to be found online. In photos from the Geeks Galore customer appreciation day from November 2010, signs with the 3 Geeks image are visible. And Courrier’s April 2011 assertion he’s getting new signs doesn’t say whether he’s removing the infringing image from his signage over. “New signs” isn’t synonymous with “compliant signs.”

    But regardless, it’s beside the point. He used the infringing image and continued to do so after a court ordered him to remove it. I reported accurately about it. And a couple of years later, he launched a fraudulent attack on me and my site. He didn’t contact me to inform me of compliance and to ask for a followup article. He opted to misrepresent my valid and legal journalistic activities, and he has yet to pay Koslowski the monetary award ordered by the court.

    The anonymous “Ares” is backing the wrong horse.

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters
  • Genre Splicing
  • A Mouthful of Dollars
  • Striking the Wrong Chord
  • Extra! Extra! Bleed All About It!
  • Creepy Crawlers

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Coming Clean
  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
January 2021
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456