Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Everybody Hercs

  • Editorials

Hulk Special #1 from 1968New publisher Radical Publishing is looking to make a name for itself in the world of comics, and it’s recruited some big-name talent to help in those efforts. The Los Angeles-based company issued a news release Tuesday to announce that comics legend Jim Steranko has provided cover artwork for the first two issues of its new Hercules: The Thracian Wars series. Furthermore, Steranko designed the look for this incarnation of Hercules as well as the cover logo for the series.

What I found interesting about the announcement was the nature of the Steranko cover art for the second issue. That cover is an homage to a well-known cover the artist produced for Marvel Comics 30 years ago: that which adorned Incredible Hulk Special #1. It’s an easily recognized image in comics, one that’s been reproduced and homaged often. Boasting a strong Will Eisner influence, perhaps the reason it’s been referenced time and time again over the years is how effective it is in conveying the power and struggle that are inherent in the premise and character. The Hulk is in danger of being crushed under a rock that spells out his own name. The earth and rock beneath his feet cracks and crumbles from the sheer weight. The seemingly simple cover says a lot about the title character. The biggest threat that the Hulk faces is himself, his own raw, uncontrolled power (and how others perceive it as a threat).

Radical might attract the attention of fans of comics history and the medium’s iconic images, especially since it’s Steranko himself who’s crafting the homage to his original effort (which, the Grand Comics Database notes, also included input from Marie Severin, who rendered the Hulk’s face on the cover).

Radical's Hercules #2Marvel's Incredible Hercules #112A potential problem arises with another recent homage to that classic cover. Four months ago, Artist Arthur Adams provided cover artwork for a Marvel comic that also paid tribute to Steranko’s Incredible Hulk Special #1 image. That comic: Incredible Hercules #112.

I’m not suggesting Marvel will have a problem with another publisher offering an homage to one of its classic covers. Radical’s Hercules #2 Steranko cover is clearly an homage, not a swipe. And hey, the original artist is merely reproducing his own efforts. Where’s the harm? Well, a potential problem arises as a result of the convergence of a number of factors. Both covers feature characters called Hercules. They’re published within a short timeframe (the Radical comic book in question is due out in June).

The same character. The same pose. The same genre of storytelling. The same medium. That’s a lot of sameness.

I’m not saying Marvel will or should take issue with Radical Publishing’s move. The chances of the average super-hero comic enthusiast mistaking the new title from a small publisher for a Marvel title are limited, perhaps even negligent. But when it comes to copyright law and trademark protection, the reality of the situation rarely comes into play. There are principles and precedents to consider.

Conversely, let’s consider for a moment that the folks at Radical Publishing considered the slight possibility of some kind of controversy or a legal challenge. Hey, they could have anticipated. It’s incredibly (pardon the pun) difficult for a new, small publisher to get noticed in the Western comics market today, and any kind of discussion about Radical’s products can be helpful.

After all, there’s no such thing as bad publicity, right?

April 22, 2008 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

Quick Critiques – April 27, 2008 → ← Fence Post

15 thoughts on “Everybody Hercs”

  1. anthony r. says:
    April 23, 2008 at 1:38 am

    and so similarly dressed! maybe if radical’s were wearing a nice dress suit it wouldn’t cause such a problem, heh. it does seem rather odd tht they would choose such timing to release such a similar cover, but maybe it was just a coincidence and this was produced some time ahead the release of the cover image for herc 112, as farfetched as that may sound.

  2. Jon H says:
    April 23, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    The thing is, it’s pretty easy to imagine probably lines of thought that would end up producing the similar covers, without the new Steranko intending to mimic the Marvel cover.

    Put Steranko on a Hercules comic, and it’s pretty natural that he’d think of homaging his Hulk cover, since they’re both super-strong characters, and he was the original artist.

    For Marvel, the replacement of Hulk with Hercules naturally leads to the same homage.

    If it wasn’t Steranko doing the Radical cover, I’d think it more suspicious. But if you’re going to hire Steranko, then you pretty much want him to do a cover that echoes one of his classics, and Hercules arguably lends himself to this one.

    So I figure it’s just a coincidence.

    I mean, if you’re planning out the Radical series last year, what would you think were the odds that Hercules would get such prominent play in 2008?

    And once Marvel’s plans became evident, would you expect Radical to ask Steranko to redo a perfectly fine cover?

  3. Don MacPherson says:
    April 23, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    Jon wrote:
    If it wasn’t Steranko doing the Radical cover, I’d think it more suspicious. But if you’re going to hire Steranko, then you pretty much want him to do a cover that echoes one of his classics, and Hercules arguably lends himself to this one.

    I agree completely, Jon. I think you make some assumptions about the lead time involved in crafting the cover, though. I think there’s a possibility that the publication of the Arthur Adams Incredible Hercules cover and the commissioning of Steranko to create the Radical cover could be within a relatively close timeframe. That could still easily be coincidental, though.

  4. Sandy says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Although there may be no such thing as bad publicity, there is such a thing as costly lawsuits. And at least one other small publisher has run into a copyright lawsuit with Marvel that pretty much killed the company (legal fees are expensive, even when you win). See the following paragraph from the Wikipedia entry on Jim Shooter’s Defiant Comics:

    In early 1993, Defiant announced that its first title, Plasm, would, innovatively, be released as a series of trading cards that could be put together in an album to form “issue #0”. Upon hearing the news, Marvel Comics threatened a lawsuit against Defiant, claiming the new title violated a Marvel UK trademark for their book/character Plasmer. Though Defiant changed the title to Warriors of Plasm, Marvel continued its lawsuit. While the court court eventually ruled in favor of Defiant, the legal process depleted the company’s capital, having cost over $300,000 in legal fees. Defiant ended publication in Summer 1995.

  5. Don MacPherson says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:11 pm

    Sandy, thanks for the input, but one must keep in mind that there’s a significant difference between the two scenarios, and that’s the fact that Marvel can only trademark and copyright its version of Hercules. The actual name: it’s fair game. Radical’s version (designed by Steranko as well) incorporates lion-head imagery, as does Marvel. But that’s in keeping with the myth upon which both characters are based.

  6. Sandy says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Oh – I’m not saying that Marvel would win a lawsuit, but the mere fact that it opens up the possibility of being sued is not really a good thing for Radical.

  7. Don MacPherson says:
    April 23, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    My point was, though, that the kind of lawsuit you cite as an example isn’t applicable in this case.

  8. McE says:
    April 23, 2008 at 3:27 pm

    And all of these covers have a thematic similarity to Auguste Rodin’s Caryatid Who Has Fallen under Her Stone, an image most art majors would have run across.

  9. Don MacPherson says:
    April 23, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    Thanks for that perspective, McE. For those wanting to see the sculture to which he’s referring, click here.

    I agree, there’s a “thematic similarity,” and I’m glad McE doesn’t overstate it beyond that. There doesn’t seem to be enough similarities in the images for it to be a direct influence on Steranko’s original cover design.

  10. Rob Rogers says:
    April 23, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    The chances of the average super-hero comic enthusiast mistaking the new title from a small publisher for a Marvel title are limited, perhaps even negligent.

    I think you might mean “negligible” there.

    Anyway, it seems to me that one problem that Radical might run into here is of potential buyers glancing at it, thinking it’s an alternate cover for the recent Marvel issue, and moving on by, not realizing that it’s an entirely different story.

    Heck of a nice cover, though.

  11. Don MacPherson says:
    April 23, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    You’re absolutely right about “negligible,” Rob. I’m used to using the word “negligent” somewhat frequently in my day job as a courts/crime reporter. 🙂

    Good point about some Marvel readers perhaps dismissing the Radical comic as something they’ve already bought. Then again, one could argue that they want the variant-cover collectors to think just that and snap it up. Unlikely, but possible.

  12. Alan Coil says:
    April 23, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    I don’t recall hearing before that Marvel continued the lawsuit and that it bankrupted the company. I just remember the Defiant line not being that good, and at the time, the market wasn’t very forgiving.

    Not that I am saying Sandy isn’t right, just that I never heard that at the time AND I don’t really trust Wiki.

  13. Robert says:
    April 26, 2008 at 9:55 am

    Dan – just more words of encouragement. Again, from foreign currency, team books, and Steranko tribute art – you cover matters showing an appreciative insight. You display a knowledgeable non-bias approach that’s so refreshing these days.

    No one has to tell you to “keep up the good work” because your work is a manifestation of quality throughout. It’s already a given!

    Thanks!!!!

  14. Don MacPherson says:
    April 27, 2008 at 8:08 pm

    Thanks for the kind words, Robert. I take issue with only one of your comments: my name is Don, nor Dan. 🙂

  15. Tony says:
    May 10, 2008 at 9:44 pm

    Jim recently asked us to post a series of Homage images to his most famous covers, including of course the Hulk annual #1. Jim agreed to write some commentary on the genesis of the covers. During this time of being immersed in Steranko Homages, Jim created the Hercules homage image. He said if everyone else is doing it, why not him 🙂

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • Coming Clean
  • Land of the Freaks, Home of the Strange
  • Biorhythms
  • Psychia-tryst
  • Snowfall
  • The Warriors Three
  • Scoop
  • Grimes and Punishment
  • A Walk in the Clark
  • Multiply the Quantum Vector by Pie

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • Coming Clean
  • Land of the Freaks, Home of the Strange
  • Biorhythms
  • Psychia-tryst
  • Snowfall

Recent Comments

  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
  • Lord Wyngate on Web of Lies
December 2019
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456