Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Look Ahead, But Look Out

  • Features

Marvel Comics’ decision to cancel its advance-preview copy program and to scale back online previews could impact sales of Marvel titles on a grassroots, word-of-mouth level, says one comics retailer.

News broke Monday that Marvel is discontinuing its First Look program, through which retailers could pay a small fee to get a handful of comics in their hands the week before their release. The retailer who announced the First Look cancellation expressed his dismay, as it was a perk that drew him to comics retailing in the first place. He said the First Look cancellation stems from a majority of participants declining the opportunity of maintaining it by agreeing to an increase in the weekly fee associated with the program.

Eye on Comics asked comics retailer (and friend) Randy Lander about the report, and he confirmed Marvel cancelled the program and the circumstances leading to its demise. He also confirmed that DC Comics cancelled its counterpart preview-package program, dubbed Sneak Peek, some time ago. DC had promised to replace Sneak Peek with something else, he said, but that alternative never materialized.

At one time, Marvel did offer online previews of multiple titles through the Diamond Comic Distributors retailers-only website. Lander — who runs Rogues Gallery Comics & Games in Round Rock, Tex. — said those previews aren’t available on the Diamond site anymore.

He said previewing upcoming releases was useful for his business, as it kept him and his employees more informed on some of the product.

“Having a preview of books was invaluable in terms of the staff knowing what books they liked and wanted to hand-sell, so it definitely helped with new product, relaunches, new story arcs, etc.,” Lander said.

“With all the work that gets done on new comic days, it’s now unlikely that we’ll be as well informed about the specifics of that week’s comics until later in the week, which means it’s harder to knowledgeably and confidently recommend new stuff to customers… It’s not crucial by any means, but the First Looks were a bit of an edge for DC and Marvel in terms of having us talking about their books.”

The loss of First Look, Sneak Peek and online previews just means that when it comes to in-store recommendations, Marvel and DC are back on a level playing field with other publishers, he said.

“Which is fine with me as a retailer, but it might be a source of some consternation for Marvel or DC,” Lander said.

He, his staff and others in comics retailing won’t be without previews of Marvel comics entirely, though.

“Marvel is launching a retailers-only site, and there seems to be an intent to provide full PDF previews there, but there is a cost attached. There have been some mentions on Marvel’s part of free usage of the site, although the implication is that such free usage would be limited,” Lander said.

However, he expects Marvel is going to govern its digital previews carefully. Lander also reviews comics and has had access to a media website featuring previews as well. That site featured full previews of a wide selection of upcoming Marvel releases, he said, which was fine for reviewing purposes.

“But right after the First Look was canceled, that site began hosting only three- to four-page previews instead,” he said. “It seems likely to me, given the launch of the retailer site and the scaling back of the reviewer site, that this is sort of a re-positioning of Marvel’s previews and how they are used.”

It’s understandable that Marvel would want to tread carefully when it comes to digital copies of its publications. Online piracy is a concern for Marvel Entertainment, just as it is for any media company these days. It’s doubtful any comics publisher today wants to make it easier for its comics to be distributed for free online.

Then again, digital reproduction plays a big part in the preparation and publishing of comics today, so the publisher already had easy access to digital versions of its output. Furthermore, digital presentation is something with which Marvel concerns itself greatly now, as it’s actively developing its Digital Comics Unlimited as a viable revenue generator.

November 11, 2008 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

Quick Critiques – Nov. 12, 2008 → ← Love Shoplifts Us Up Where We Belong

5 thoughts on “Look Ahead, But Look Out”

  1. Robert Frost says:
    November 11, 2008 at 9:50 am

    I say good for Marvel. It looks like they are trying to get a handle on the surplus information that is out there ahead of a comics release, which takes all the surprise out of reading comics. The reading experience for all of us will be better if no-one knows what happens until they read the book.

  2. Chris Rice says:
    November 11, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Robert, it’s a good point, but it was actually quite rare for Marvel or DC to include event books of the type that would be discussed online in their previews.
    I think this is very much an economic decision, the first of a great many I suspect we’ll see over the next couple of years.

  3. Kirth says:
    November 12, 2008 at 9:32 am

    Now if both companies could deliver product ON TIME.

    Any comments on the Legion of Three Worlds delay?

    I think the term “comic-book professional” has finally become redundant. 

  4. Botch the Crab says:
    November 12, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    I wonder if any of this has to do with trying to quell bad reviews that may reduce the sale of some books. That sounds like a typical corporate mentality. Never mind that good reviews may increase the sale of other books that may otherwise be overlooked…

  5. Don MacPherson says:
    November 12, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    Botch wrote:
    I wonder if any of this has to do with trying to quell bad reviews that may reduce the sale of some books.

    I really don’t know how much reviews impact the sales of Marvel and DC super-hero titles. If they did, Ultimates 3 ought to be Marvel’s worst-selling book, not one of its top ones. Sure, some customers may avoid certain titles based on poor reviews, but I doubt the numbers making such decisions are of a level to really have an impact that the publishers would notice.

    I think good and bad reviews have more of an influence of small-press books and some of the bigger publishers’ smaller-run books.

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • Credit Report
  • Reaction Re: Action
  • Gravity Fails
  • Superman Isn’t the Only Action Hero
  • Discovering Treasures of Bronze
  • Quick Critiques – April 15, 2018
  • Pug Drunk Love
  • I Can’t Thrive at 55
  • Justice Replayed Is Justice Replied
  • Quick Critiques – April 7, 2018

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • Credit Report
  • Reaction Re: Action
  • Gravity Fails
  • Superman Isn’t the Only Action Hero
  • Discovering Treasures of Bronze

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Reaction Re: Action
  • Brock on Discovering Treasures of Bronze
  • Johanna on Causes of Death
  • Suicide Squad: Hell to Pay – Comics Worth Reading on Causes of Death
  • Matthew Halteman on Alphabet Soup
April 2018
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Archives

  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456