Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Scar Issue

  • Reviews - DC

Batman: Three Jokers #1
Writer: Geoff Johns
Artist/Cover artist: Jason Fabok
Colors: Brad Anderson
Letters: Rob Leigh
Editor: Mark Doyle
Publisher: DC Comics/DC Black Label imprint
Price: $6.99 US

It comes as no surprise that DC is inundating its readership with so many Joker-related comics over the past year. Given the financial and critical success of the Joker film starring Joaquin Phoenix, it stands to reason the publisher wouldn want to capitalize on that boosted profile. While I haven’t delved into the “Joker War” event in the main Batman titles or some of the other Black Label books featuring the Clown Prince of Crime, I was anticipating this limited series. I was thoroughly impressed with Geoff Johns’s work on Doomsday Clock, as it represented a huge leap forward in the complexity of his plotting and maturity of his characters, and as such, I was hoping for more of the same from Three Jokers. Sadly, this book doesn’t boast the same kind of strength. It has its cool moments, but it feels rushed.

Batman and two of his protégés – Batgirl and Red Hood – investigate three bizarre crimes. They’re disparate offences, committed simultaneously in different parts of Gotham, and the Joker is spotted at all three scenes. While each bears distinct but different hallmarks of Joker crimes, the grinning ghoul couldn’t have been directly involved in all three, could he? The Batman and his allies are about to make some stark discoveries about the very nature of the Joker and why he’s been so unpredictable over the years.

DC has been marketing artist Jason Fabok as a star artist pretty much from the debut of his linework in their titles a few years ago, and this project appears to be the big payoff in that regard. Fabok’s style is a pleasing one, perhaps because it feels familiar. He’s a good fit here, as his style is reminiscent of that of Brian Bolland, and he’s clearly trying to emulate the look and atmosphere Bolland brought to Alan Moore’s The Killing Joke years ago. He does a good job of distinguishing the different Jokers from one another while still maintaining looks that are similar enough that one might accept the notion that expert detectives might have missed they were distinct individuals. Still, the over-reliance on closeups of the various characters in conversation makes the story seem a little flat. With a plot featuring such an inventive take on the Joker, one would expect more dynamic visuals, but it’s not to be found here. Then again, the writer is clearly aiming for a grittier, more grounded tone, so Fabok is restricted in the visual offerings he can deliver.

The notion that there’s more than one Joker causing problems for Gotham’s protectors and it could’ve been that way for years should be a game-changing development for the long history of the Dark Knight and his allies, but the speed with which they accept that premise without little to no reaction or even questioning of its plausibility robs this story of credibility. It definitely feels as though there isn’t nearly enough investigation before the heroes arrive at that conclusion, and not enough denying or challenging of the possibility.

The opening scene, in which Alfred tends to Bruce’s fresh wounds while we glimpse what caused the extensive scarring on the protagonist’s form, is an effective one, and it paints a life of horror and pain for the hero. Unfortunately, it feels rather familiar. Readers have been down this road before. The ultimate message – that the Joker has inflicted the worst scars, even if they can’t all be seen – has a certain power, but even a reader with only a passing knowledge of the Batman and the Joker likely knows all of this already. The visuals paint a detailed pictured of the Batcave, though, and it would have been interesting to learn more about the Dark Knight’s obsession with collecting reminders of the horrors he’s fought and seen.

Batman: The Killing Joke was considered a masterpiece in its day and still sells well for DC. In more recent years, people have criticized its use of Barbara Gordon as a cheap, sexual prop in the ongoing war between hero and villain. Crippling her, raping her, sexualizing her in her greatest moment of pain and tragedy… it doesn’t sit well today. The further sexualization of the character in the animated adaptation of that graphic novella didn’t help matters. Now, others took that terrible turn with the character and used it to transform her into an empowered new kind of heroine as Oracle, but she’s been restored to the role of Batgirl. Here, Johns has the character reliving that horrendous assault on her physical form and her dignity, and the choice to have her do that naked in the shower seems rather tone deaf to the legitimate criticisms of the source material that have arisen in the years since. It was a poor storytelling choice, and it took me out of the plot.

After only one issue (and the second due out this week), Three Jokers has proven to be a massive commercial success for DC Comics, and I suspect it’s been a boon to comics retailers as well. But unfortunately, that triumph in her terms of business isn’t matched on the creative side. What could have been an engrossing mystery and novel new take on one of the most iconic villains in all of pop culture feels as though it’s stumbled out of the gate, due in no small part to an accelerated pace. It’s also rooted in two of the most noteworthy yet ugliest moments in the Batman mythos, and I question if one of them merits the revisitation, given how society has changed and views the almost casual mistreatment of female characters to further the narratives of male counterparts. 6/10

Follow Eye on Comics on Facebook or on Twitter.

September 27, 2020 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

Teed Off → ← Of Gods and Monsters

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent posts

  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters
  • Genre Splicing
  • A Mouthful of Dollars
  • Striking the Wrong Chord
  • Extra! Extra! Bleed All About It!
  • Creepy Crawlers

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Coming Clean
  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
January 2021
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456