Eye on Comics
  • About/Submissions

Mad Men (of Steel)

  • Features

There have been any number of stories in the past three decades deconstructing the super-hero genre, and a great deal of them focus on or include a deconstruction of the Superman archetype. If such stories are crafted well, I generally enjoy them, even if the approach isn’t nearly as avant garde today as it was in the 1980s. Now while the notion of such a deconstruction is far from rare, I was surprised to see not one but two new ongoing titles debuting earlier this year, both with their own takes on a corrupt Superman-like figure.

The Mighty by writers Peter J. Tomasi and Keith Champagne and artist Peter Snejbjerg (and later Chris Samnee) debuted Feb. 4. It’s published by DC Comics, but surprisingly enough, it isn’t listed under one of the publisher’s imprints despite the fact that it’s not set in the DC Universe along with its other super-hero characters. Two months later, on April 1, Boom! Studios launched Irredeemable by writer (and its editor-in-chief) Mark Waid and artist Peter Krause after a fairly significant promotional campaign revolving around Mark Waid’s popularity and reputation in the industry. Each title features its own Superman — Alpha One and the Plutonian, respectively — and each one of those characters proves to be malevolent. Each title features protagonists who are trying to uncover the mysteries behind the man of steel and they endeavor to avoid detection by his all-seeing eyes.

I was struck by the fact that such similar titles were being released at the same time, and I wondered how they’d fare and how they compare. Another trait The Mighty and Irredeemable have in common is that they are well written and well illustrated. They’re good comics, featuring compelling characters and dark, engrossing elements.

The books differ in a number of ways as well, significantly so that I’m able to enjoy both separately. I never get the feeling of redundancy after reading the two titles.

The PlutonianThe Mighty features one man’s efforts to uncover the secrets of the world’s only superhuman and to expose him for the threat that he represents. Irredeemable, conversely, features the efforts of a group of superhumans to uncover the secrets of the world’s most powerful superhuman who’s quite publicly turned from good to evil (at least, that’s how it seems so far). Thus far, Waid has constructed the individual issues of his series to offer a different character study. The first issue focused on Samsara, the second on Alana Patel and so on. In The Mighty, we’re presented mainly with one extended character study, that of Gabriel Cole, once a young boy whom Alpha One saved who’s grown up into a man who commands an organization dedicated to supporting the good the hero does in the world.

Neither of these titles has made its way into the top 100 comics according to Diamond Comic Distributors. Irredeemable #4 sold 13.623 copies in July, coming in at 148 on Diamond’s top 300 comics for that month. Surprisingly, The Mighty #6, the July issue, sold only 6,660 copies. That’s surprising in that it’s published by DC, which boasts a higher profile and more proven track record than Boom! Studios. Of course, Irredeemable has the advantage of greater publisher support, more promotion and the higher profile of its writer.

Alpha OneIt’s a safe bet that The Mighty won’t last much longer at DC with those numbers. In fact, I assume it’s only lasted this long thanks to what is no doubt a strong relationship between Tomasi, a former senior DC editor, and his one-time office-mates. Of course, even if The Mighty was selling at Irredeemable levels, it’d be in danger of moving to the chopping block. Mind you, while 13K+ a month would be a problem at DC, it’s no doubt cause for celebration at Boom! Studios. Irredeemable is its top seller, and the title seems to be gaining momentum, as the fourth issue sold almost 800 copies more than the third in terms of initial orders.

Something else these two titles have in common is the context in which they were approved and went into production. While their first issues were released early on in the new Barack Obama administration in the United States, the editorial ball would have begun rolling for these books no later than 2008, during the waning days of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney’s time in office. The Mighty is about the ultimate protector and authority figure plotting behind the scenes against those he seemingly serves, sacrificing lives and invading privacy without anyone knowing. In Irredeemable, the Plutonian has been transformed from adored hero into overt villain, feared and hated by the entire planet. It’s not hard to see the previous Republican administration (regardless of one’s politics) in both of these Supermen.

Another commonality is the mystery surrounding the central Superman-like figures. While the Plutonian’s crimes against humanity are overt, splayed out for all to see, no one knows why he’s committing them. And while Alpha One’s murders and abductions are carried out in secret, again, we don’t know why he’s committing these travesties. Mystery is a cornerstone for both titles, and something makes me suspect that all isn’t as it seems in either case. the audience is meant to be horrified by the actions of the main characters in both books, but in either case, it’s possible that seemingly corrupt actions might have a larger purpose. Who knows? I plan on continuing reading to find out — in both cases.

Follow Eye on Comics on Twitter.

September 8, 2009 Don MacPherson

Post navigation

A Tour Through Terror → ← Let’s Gets Smashed

3 thoughts on “Mad Men (of Steel)”

  1. Ivo says:
    September 9, 2009 at 6:48 am

    It’s a damn shame nobody’s paying attention to the other Superman-gone-wrong in stands, The Life and Times of Savior 28. I find it much better than either The Mighty or Irredeemable.

  2. Argo Plummer says:
    September 9, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Don:

    I agree that I can read both The Mighty and Irredeemable and never feel like either is redundant. I truly enjoy both. I’m dismayed to see that The Mighty‘s sales are so low–I knew they were bad, but less than 7,000 copies is dismal. I can’t believe it hasn’t been cancelled yet. I read somewhere on line that The Mighty was to be a 12-issue mini, but I haven’t seen that corroborated anywhere yet. I will be with it until the end though and and add it to my long list of DC titles that were abandoned too early — Chase, Chronos, Primal Force, Shadowpact, Stars and STRIPE are just a few that jump to mind right now.

    Ivo: Nice to see the love for Life and Times of Savior 28. It is different from the other two in the sense that it is a planned mini. However, I too enjoy it more than Irredeemable or The Mighty. I love the twist that the world sees Savior 28 as having turned evil or gone rogue when he is trying to live up to the true ideals of peace, love and justice. Classic DeMatteis, who is one of my favorite and one of the industry’s most underrated talents.

  3. Kevin Agot says:
    September 11, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Both The Mighty and Irredeemable are great stories being told. The Mighty is a planned maxi with issue #12 being its last issue. I hope this book finds greater success as a trade. More people need to be reading this book. I hope that with the end so near, its publication doesn’t get truncated. I’ve been burned with too many titles that I’ve loved that never saw the final issue. Alan Moore’s 1963, Jimenez’s Otherworld and The Twelve come to mind. Moreover, these were all minis or maxis with a planned finite end. After getting burned too many times, I sometimes am demotivated to purchase singles but am instead tempted to wait and purchase the trade.

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue
  • Of Gods and Monsters
  • Genre Splicing
  • A Mouthful of Dollars
  • Striking the Wrong Chord
  • Extra! Extra! Bleed All About It!

Categories

Archives

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Original Comic Art
  • Reviews – Action Lab
  • Reviews – AfterShock
  • Reviews – AiT/PlanetLar
  • Reviews – Archie
  • Reviews – Black Mask
  • Reviews – Boom! Studios
  • Reviews – Dark Horse
  • Reviews – DC
  • Reviews – DC/Vertigo
  • Reviews – DC/Wildstorm
  • Reviews – Devil's Due
  • Reviews – Drawn & Quarterly
  • Reviews – Dynamite
  • Reviews – Fantagraphics
  • Reviews – IDW
  • Reviews – Image
  • Reviews – Indy/Small Press
  • Reviews – Legendary
  • Reviews – Lion Forge
  • Reviews – Marvel
  • Reviews – Miscellaneous
  • Reviews – NBM
  • Reviews – Oni Press
  • Reviews – Other Media
  • Reviews – Quick Critiques
  • Reviews – Radical
  • Reviews – Slave Labor
  • Reviews – Titan
  • Reviews – Tokyopop
  • Reviews – Valiant
  • Reviews – Zenescope
  • Reviews- Humanoids
  • The New 52 Review Project

Search

Recent Posts

  • Burnt-out Ends of Smoky Days
  • They Do Need Those Stinkin’ Badges
  • Future Tense
  • Teed Off
  • Scar Issue

Recent Comments

  • Marcelo Soares on Coming Clean
  • Perry on Scoop
  • R Phillips on “Fixed… With Tape”
  • Leslie on Avengers… Disassemble Those Guys
  • Perry Beider on 2018 Glass Eye Awards – Creators
March 2021
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
Powered by WordPress | theme cats456