Eye on Comics

Comics criticism and commentary from Don MacPherson

Quick Critiques – Jan. 29, 2007

Posted by Don MacPherson on January 29th, 2007

Civil War: The Return #1 (Marvel Comics)
by Paul Jenkins, Tom Raney & Scott Hanna

After reading this one-shot, I was left with one nagging question: what was the point? The latter story, featuring the Sentry and his struggle to decide which side of the superhuman civil war to support, seems completely redundant when one considers another writer explored the question in New Avengers and that we’ve seen the Sentry side-by-side with Mr. Fantastic and Iron Man in the core Civil War title itself. That means we’re left with an extended and rather unimaginative fight scene with the Absorbing Man, resolving with the stereotypical revelation that the Sentry has too much power for the villain to leech from him. The main story, though, is the one that’s going to have comics fans talking… at least longtime readers familiar with the dead hero returns in these pages. I suspect many will scream that this story mars a rather poignant story of an atypical but rather human death in the Marvel Universe, but what strikes me about it is how unnecessary it is. The connection to Civil War is tenuous at best, and there’s little reason for the hero to act as he does. I do like the concept of a man living his life knowing exactly when and how he’s going to die and how that might mess with one’s noggin, but Paul Jenkins really doesn’t have the space to explore that idea all that much. Tom Raney’s art is quite strong. He brings out an appropriately pained look on the resurrected hero’s face. The colors are bright and crisp throughout the issue, reinforcing the cosmic energy that’s at play. 5/10

Okko: The Cycle of Water #1 (Archaia Studios Press)
by Hub

I’d heard good things about this French import and was pleased when I got a chance to read this latest release from Archaia Studios Press. The publisher has had a solid track record as of late, launching Mouse Guard and The Killer to critical acclaim over the past year. I enjoy both of those titles, but it doesn’t seem as though Okko is going to join them on my must-read list. French creator hub has crafted a story that’s clearly Japanese in influence. It’s not Amerimanga, but Francomanga, I suppose (will that anger right-wing manga lovers in the United States?). The historical and cultural setting is so far removed from my own so as to seem almost alien, and I just found it impossible to connect with any of the characters. Furthermore, I’m at a loss as to why this series is titled for Okko. Of the four heroes in the story, he is not only the least interesting character but the least heroic as well. The Asian influence in the art isn’t overt; Hub doesn’t resort to the oversized eyes that are typical of the manga style. Still, the Japanese touch, though subtler than usual, is unmistakable, eclipsing the expected European leanings in Hub’s work as well. There are some interesting visuals, such as Little Carp’s tattoo and Master Noburo’s almost bestial design. Actually, Noburo’s dichotomous character — monstrously fierce yet quietly gentle — is probably the most interesting element in the book, but there’s just too many other elements at play. The story is difficult to follow, and we’re not given any great reason to care about the characters, save for the fact that one is beautiful and innocent, and another is young and dedicated. 5/10

Red Sonja Annual #1 (Dynamite Entertainment)
by Michael Avon Oeming & Stephen Sadowski

Just about every time I thumb through a Dynamite Entertainment comic book, I come away a little bit surprised, and the story and art in this annual was no exception. Oeming’s plot is a novel one in that it doesn’t feature the title character as the heroine, but rather what she represents and how her legend can serve to inspire. The writer embraces a sense of medieval feminism as a disgruntled and overworked wife decides she’s had enough of watching her husband pimp prostitutes and ordering her to clean spills and stains. Her rebellion is over the top, but it’s in keeping with the period and the violent tone of Red Sonja. I think what I enjoyed the most about this story, though, is that the protagonist isn’t some perfectly shaped, impossible paragon of human physicality. Myria is a big-boned and buxom woman who nevertheless exudes strength. She’s also rather fetching, even when compared to the rake-thin prostitutes she endeavors to protect. Sadowski’s art is realistic in tone. Actually, his depiction of Myria reminded me of Sara Ramirez, a cast member from Grey’s Anatomy and another woman who’s proving to the world that big is beautiful. The playful tone of Oeming’s script early on, with the puppet show and Myria’s amusing frustration, immediately draws one into the story. My main complaint about this comic is how quickly it reads. An annual should feel a little beefier than a regular issue. 6/10

Wolverine #50 (Marvel Comics)
by Jeph Loeb, Simone Bianchi & Andrea Silvestri/Loeb, McGuinness & Vines

I remember when the previous Wolverine ongoing series reached its 50th issue, Marvel marked the occasion with a special, die-cut cover, with “claw marks” that offered a glimpse of what was to be found within. This time around, Marvel debuts a new creative team, bringing some industry star power to the title. The strength of Simone Bianchi’s work at DC Comics was more than enough to pique my interest, and Jeph Loeb, though more of a hit-and-miss comics writer as of late, has also penned some landmark books such as Batman: The Long Halloween. “First Blood,” his debut story arc on this title, ain’t no Long Halloween. Bianchi’s art is lovely, and he captures the feral and powerful qualities of the title character and his sometimes-nemesis, Sabretooth. Bianchi’s work is looks like a cross between the styles of Barry Windsor-Smith and Leinil Yu here. But Loeb’s script revolves around a pointless fight, and one we’ve seen time and time again at that. Loeb’s backup script also consists of a fight we’ve literally seen before, but what’s really confusing about it is some kind of weird crossover with Marvel’s Ultimate universe. It felt surprisingly like Loeb is trying to foster the kind of alternate-reality story he penned when working on Superman/Batman. Wolverine seems like a poor fit for such a story, especially when Marvel has Exiles to fill that role. And McGuinness’s over-the-top, cartoony art seems to conflict with the narration, which strives for a more grounded tone. 4/10

16 Responses to “Quick Critiques – Jan. 29, 2007”

  1. Rambutan Says:

    Don, you say you always “come away a bit surprised” when reading Dynamite comics. Is that surprise as in ‘pleasently surprised’ or rather in a negative way? It isn’t entirely clear from your review. Personally I am enjoying the ongoing Red Sonja series a lot. Oeming and Rubi are doing an excellent job so far. Genrally strong plotting and beautiful art. I’m much less enthusiastic about the numerous one-shots and minis by other writers. I haven’t received the annual yet but am looking forward to have a fresh new angle on Sonja.

  2. matt Says:

    I grew tired of watching Wolverine and Sabretooth fight 10 years ago. I think the best thing about the Ultimate universe is that Wolverine actually killed him.

    Marvel brought the Sentry back, placed him in New Avengers and then quickly discovered that they had no idea how to use him or why they brought him back.

  3. fan4fan Says:

    Brought the Sentry back?

    He was a ret-con!

  4. Don MacPherson Says:

    Rambutan wrote:
    Don, you say you always “come away a bit surprised” when reading Dynamite comics. Is that surprise as in ‘pleasently surprised’ or rather in a negative way? It isn’t entirely clear from your review.

    I just meant that much of Dynamite’s output is made up of genres or property in which I usually have little interest. For example, the whole Conan/Red Sonja barbarian genre is one that’s rarely appearled to me.

  5. Don MacPherson Says:

    Fan4fan wrote:
    Brought the Sentry back? He was a ret-con!

    Yes, the Sentry was a retcon, but one Paul Jenkins created for five-issue limited series and a number of one-shots in 2000 and 2001. I think Matt was saying that the character was then forgotten for a few years until Bendis dusted him off for inclusion in New Avengers in late 2004.

    And I think Matt’s right… Marvel hasn’t seemed to know what to do with the character since his recent resurrection.

  6. Fan4Fan Says:

    Ah…I see.

    I guess I was too much in a geological frame of mind where a couple of years is nothing.

    Now, someone like Kutrgo (Master of Planet X) who first appeared in Fantastic Four #7 (October, 1962) then a second time in Marvel Feature #11 (September, 1973)… now *that* is bringing someone back.

    The hiatus for Sentry was hardly a blip by comparison…. :)

  7. Fan4Fan Says:

    Oops.. that should have been Kurrgo.

    Impossible Man is another character given a long rest.

  8. Don MacPherson Says:

    Fan4fan wrote:
    Impossible Man is another character given a long rest.

    Oh, I’d say he turns up on a semi-regular basis. I think his most recent appearance (at least in the mainstream Marvel Universe) would have been in Marvel Knights 4, within the past couple of years.

  9. Tomas Says:

    Close: his (the Impossible Man’s) most recent appearance was in one of the Stan Lee Meets one-shots.

  10. Don MacPherson Says:

    Ah, thanks, Tomas. I passed on those one-shots, so I wasn’t aware of the Poppuppian’s appearance. ;)

  11. Fan4Fan Says:

    Ach… again with the ambiguity on my part.

    I was referring to Impossible Man’s initial appearance (FF #11) and his next one (FF #175).

  12. matt Says:

    It seems Bendis fell in to the “Wow! Having Superman in the Avengers would be great!”, then having no idea how to actually make him work in a team concept. He was never intended to exist in the Marvel Universe and Jenkins might be the only person that has a shot of really working with him in the way he was intended.

    So far, I think the Sentry’s only contribution to the Marvel U was tearing Carnage in half and being really indecisive.

    The Sentry isnt the only character to get the Bendis reinvigoration plan and then immediately get lost in the shuffle. Spider-Woman has encountered the same thing.

    Perhaps you can blame part of this on Millar and Civil War, but the only person lately to really benefit from the New Avengers or being used by bendis has been Luke Cage.

    I think Bendis and a few others now see why Superman is so hard to write effectively. How do you fit in a guy that could destroy everyone and everything and make him not marginalize everyone around him.

  13. Joseph Johnson Says:

    I felt the same way about Okko. After reading and loving both Mouse Guard and The Killer I was tremendously disappointed in Okko. Looking forward to Secret History and hoping that’ll be a worthy replacement for the disappointment of Okko.

  14. Don MacPherson Says:

    Joseph wrote:
    Looking forward to Secret History and hoping that’ll be a worthy replacement for the disappointment of Okko.

    Secret History? I haven’t heard about it yet. What’s the premise? Who are the creators? Is it another import?

  15. JohnnyZito Says:

    You guys are dead on about the Sentry.

    I think Captain Marvel, a similar Superman-arch type, might languish in the same way now that he’s “returned.”

  16. Don MacPherson Says:

    Zito wrote:
    I think Captain Marvel, a similar Superman-arch type, might languish in the same way now that he’s “returned.”

    My hope is that his “return” will be short-lived, hopefully with the time-jump coming to an end at the end of the upcoming Captain Marvel series.